advantages of the putting out system

Project Fab

4 min read

·

19-03-2025

1

0

Share

The Putting-Out System: A Surprisingly Advantageous Model of Early Industrialization

The putting-out system, also known as the domestic system or cottage industry, predates the factory system as the dominant mode of production in the early stages of industrialization. While often overshadowed by the later factory model, a closer examination reveals that the putting-out system offered a surprising array of advantages, both for producers and consumers, within its specific historical and economic context. Understanding these advantages illuminates not only the evolution of industrial production but also the complexities of economic development.

One of the most significant advantages of the putting-out system was its decentralized nature. Unlike the factory system, which concentrated production in a single, centralized location, the putting-out system distributed work among numerous households. This dispersed production model minimized the risk of catastrophic losses. If a fire destroyed a factory, the entire production process was halted. In the putting-out system, the loss of one household's output was a smaller, more manageable setback. This resilience to localized disruptions was a crucial advantage, especially in a time before sophisticated insurance mechanisms or robust transportation networks.

Furthermore, the decentralized nature of the putting-out system facilitated wider geographic reach. Producers could tap into a larger pool of labor spread across rural areas, overcoming limitations imposed by concentrated urban workforces. This was particularly advantageous for industries reliant on readily available raw materials, like textiles, where transporting bulky materials to a central location could be costly and inefficient. The putting-out system allowed for production closer to the source of raw materials, minimizing transportation costs and time. This also contributed to a wider distribution of economic activity, mitigating regional inequalities.

Another key advantage was the lower initial capital investment required compared to the factory system. Establishing a factory required significant upfront investment in land, buildings, machinery, and tools. The putting-out system, on the other hand, leveraged existing household resources. Workers provided their own tools and often worked in their own homes, minimizing the need for substantial capital outlay by the merchant-entrepreneur. This lower barrier to entry encouraged greater participation, fostering competition and innovation. The reduced risk and lower initial investment made it an accessible model for entrepreneurs with limited resources.

The putting-out system also fostered a degree of flexibility and adaptability. Production could be easily adjusted to meet fluctuations in demand. Unlike the factory system, which often faced high fixed costs associated with maintaining a large workforce and expensive machinery, the putting-out system could readily scale production up or down based on market conditions. This agility allowed producers to respond to seasonal variations in demand and changing consumer preferences more effectively. This adaptability proved crucial in an era of volatile markets and unpredictable economic conditions.

Moreover, the putting-out system offered a degree of labor specialization, although less pronounced than in factories. While individual households might perform multiple tasks, the division of labor was still present. Certain households might specialize in specific stages of production, such as spinning or weaving, creating a rudimentary form of specialization that enhanced efficiency. This specialization, coupled with the geographically dispersed workforce, allowed for the production of more complex goods compared to purely individual artisanal production.

The system also had inherent social advantages, particularly in rural areas. It provided supplemental income for families, helping to alleviate poverty and offering an alternative to agricultural labor. This supplementary income was crucial for rural households, especially during periods of agricultural hardship. The flexibility of the system allowed individuals to combine agricultural work with textile production, creating a more stable and diversified livelihood.

However, it's crucial to acknowledge that the putting-out system also faced limitations and disadvantages. Quality control was often inconsistent, as the merchant-entrepreneur had limited direct supervision over the production process. This lack of control sometimes resulted in inconsistent product quality and the potential for defective goods. Furthermore, wage disputes and conflicts over payment were common, as the system relied on a complex network of trust and informal agreements. The lack of standardized wages and working conditions also led to exploitation and low pay for many workers.

Additionally, the pace of production was often slower compared to the factory system. The decentralized nature and reliance on individual household production inevitably limited the overall output. This slower pace made it difficult for the putting-out system to compete with the factory system's mass production capabilities once the latter became established. The lack of centralized control also meant that innovations were often slower to be adopted and implemented compared to the more structured environment of the factory.

Finally, the putting-out system was not immune to the economic cycles and market fluctuations of the time. Periods of economic downturn or changing consumer preferences could lead to significant unemployment and hardship for those reliant on the system for their livelihood. The lack of social safety nets or unemployment insurance made the workers highly vulnerable to these economic shifts.

Despite its limitations, the putting-out system played a crucial role in the early stages of industrialization. Its advantages – decentralized production, lower capital investment, flexibility, adaptability, and the provision of supplementary income – allowed it to flourish for a considerable period. By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of this system in its historical context, we gain a deeper understanding of the complex and multifaceted nature of economic development and the transition from pre-industrial to industrial modes of production. While ultimately superseded by the factory system, the putting-out system's impact on early industrial societies remains significant and worthy of study.