what role did freedom play in the concept of 鈥渕anifest destiny鈥?

Project Fab

4 min read

·

20-03-2025

1

0

Share

The Paradox of Freedom: Manifest Destiny and its Contested Legacy

The concept of "Manifest Destiny," a 19th-century doctrine that asserted the United States' divinely ordained right to expand its dominion across North America, is deeply intertwined with the idea of freedom. However, this relationship is far from straightforward. While proponents framed westward expansion as a liberation – a freeing of both land and people – the reality was far more complex and often brutally contradicted the very ideals of liberty it purported to champion. Examining the role of freedom in Manifest Destiny reveals a paradox: a belief system that simultaneously championed freedom for some while justifying oppression and dispossession for others.

The initial articulation of Manifest Destiny, often attributed to journalist John L. O'Sullivan in 1845, emphasized the benevolent nature of American expansion. O'Sullivan argued that the United States possessed a unique mission to spread its democratic ideals and its superior civilization across the continent. This "mission," he claimed, was divinely sanctioned, a reflection of America's inherent virtue and its God-given right to conquer and control the land. Within this narrative, freedom played a central role, but it was a highly selective and conditional freedom.

For proponents of Manifest Destiny, the acquisition of new territories represented the liberation of vast tracts of land from perceived underutilization. The fertile plains and rich resources of the West, they argued, were meant to be developed and cultivated by a nation capable of harnessing their potential. This implied a freedom from the perceived limitations of European-style land ownership and a release of the continent's inherent productivity. The vast expanse of the West, in their view, symbolized limitless opportunity, a freedom from the constraints of overcrowded Eastern cities and a chance to build a new life free from the perceived injustices of the established order.

This vision resonated powerfully with many Americans, particularly those seeking economic advancement or escaping social hierarchies. The promise of free land, the possibility of striking it rich, and the allure of a new beginning fueled the westward migration, creating a powerful narrative of individual freedom and self-reliance. The Homestead Act of 1862, which granted 160 acres of public land to settlers who lived on and cultivated the land for five years, further solidified this connection between westward expansion and the ideal of individual freedom. This act symbolized the belief that land ownership was essential to true freedom and self-determination.

However, the freedom promised by Manifest Destiny was almost entirely predicated on the exclusion and subjugation of others. Native American populations, who had inhabited the land for millennia, were tragically viewed as obstacles to this divinely ordained expansion. The very idea of "liberating" the land implied the violent displacement and dispossession of indigenous peoples, their cultures systematically dismantled and their sovereignties erased. Treaties were broken, lands seized, and entire nations decimated in the name of progress and American freedom. The brutal campaigns of removal, forced assimilation, and outright extermination starkly contrast the rhetoric of liberty and self-determination that fueled the westward movement. This inherent contradiction exposes the hypocrisy at the heart of Manifest Destiny.

Similarly, the expansion into Mexican territories through war (the Mexican-American War of 1846-1848) further undermined the claim that Manifest Destiny was about liberating people. The conquest of vast swathes of Mexican land, including California, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming, resulted in the displacement and disenfranchisement of a large Mexican population. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which formalized the cession of Mexican territories to the United States, did little to protect the rights and freedoms of the Mexican residents who found themselves suddenly under American rule. The promise of freedom extended only to white American settlers, leaving behind a legacy of oppression and injustice for Mexican Americans.

Furthermore, the expansion westward was inextricably linked to the institution of slavery. The debate over whether new territories would be free or slave states fueled intense political conflict, ultimately contributing to the eruption of the American Civil War. The struggle over the expansion of slavery highlights the inherent tension within Manifest Destiny: the idea of individual freedom conflicted with the brutal reality of chattel slavery, where millions of African Americans were denied the most basic human rights. The idea of a free nation expanding its borders while simultaneously upholding a system of forced labor reveals a profound hypocrisy that continues to shape our understanding of this period.

The legacy of Manifest Destiny is therefore deeply complicated. While it fostered a powerful narrative of individual freedom and opportunity, especially for white settlers, it simultaneously justified the systematic dispossession, oppression, and violence inflicted upon Native Americans and Mexican Americans. The promise of a free and prosperous future came at the expense of others, leaving a trail of broken treaties, massacres, and enduring social inequalities. The legacy of Manifest Destiny serves as a potent reminder that the concept of freedom, especially when intertwined with nationalistic ambitions and unchecked power, can be selectively applied and easily used to justify acts of injustice and oppression. Understanding the true role of freedom in Manifest Destiny requires confronting this paradox and acknowledging the complex and often tragic consequences of its application. The narrative of Manifest Destiny, while powerfully persuasive in its time, ultimately reveals a distorted and incomplete understanding of freedom's true meaning.